PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Analytical Chemistry0 citationsOpen Access

Harmonized 1 H NMR Workflow Enables Quantitative Betaine Determination from Nontargeted Metabolite Profiling Using Internal and External Standards

BMBiagia MusioMTMaria TrisoliniRRRosa Ragone

Key Points

  • This work aims to establish a harmonized 1D 1H NMR workflow for accurate quantification of betaine in nontargeted metabolite profiling.
  • Conducted interlaboratory comparison using a common set of samples across 50 spectrometers with varying magnetic fields.
  • Analyzed betaine in durum wheat and pasta products using both internal and external standard methods.
  • Compared operator-dependent and centralized processing across five different software platforms.
  • DMSO2 and betaine provided reproducible quantification with Horwitz ratios below unity, indicating high precision.
  • TSP-d4 overestimated betaine concentration and increased variability in results.
  • Internal standard method achieved reproducibility within the 0.5-2.0 HorRat range.

Abstract

Nontargeted metabolite profiling prioritizes robust comparisons of the analytical outcomes rather than absolute concentration measurement. In this work, it is shown that a harmonized 1D 1H NMR workflow, originally adopted for nontargeted NMR analysis, can also support reliable quantitative determination of betaine when spectra acquired under profiling-oriented conditions, nonideal for quantification, are anchored to gravimetrically traceable standards and corrected by a suitable factor accounting for bias in absolute concentration estimates. This study presents the results of an interlaboratory comparison designed to investigate the main factors affecting the accuracy and reproducibility of nontargeted 1H NMR data when different spectrometers and operators are involved. The case study focused on the determination of betaine in aqueous extracts of durum wheat (cvs. Marco Aurelio and Iride) and the corresponding pasta products. A common set of samples was analyzed using a harmonized acquisition protocol across 50 spectrometers operating at magnetic field strengths ranging from 80 to 700 MHz. Two data-processing strategies were compared: operator-dependent processing (multiple operators using different software packages) and centralized processing (single operator) performed with five different software platforms. Quantification was carried out by both an internal standard method, using 3-(trimethylsilyl)-2,2,3,3-tetradeutero-propionic acid, sodium salt (TSP-d4) as a reference, and an external standard method, employing TSP-d4, dimethyl sulfone (DMSO2), and betaine as references. The results demonstrated that the largest source of variability lies in operator-dependent data-processing choices rather than instrumental characteristics. TSP-d4 systematically overestimated the betaine concentration and introduced additional variability. By contrast, DMSO2 and betaine provided accurate and highly precise quantification with Horwitz ratios consistently below unity, indicating reproducibility superior to generic interlaboratory expectations. Internal standard method also achieved reproducibility within the accepted 0.5–2.0 HorRat range. Overall, this work shows that spectra acquired for nontargeted metabolite profiling can support quantitative determination of betaine, and potentially of other selected metabolites, provided that the same acquisition and processing protocol is maintained and that appropriate gravimetrically traceable calibration is applied.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Musio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d216202fbce9130637629https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c05198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper