Systematic review evaluates trustworthiness in spinal cord stimulation research, highlighting major concerns.
We write as concerned researchers in neurostimulation and evidence synthesis. This is now the third systematic review and meta-analysis from this group on near-identical research questions,[1 2][1] all referencing the same PROSPERO systematic review protocol, in which the authors have known
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: