Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Weight-of-evidence assessment finds propylene oxide does not disrupt endocrine functions in humans or wildlife, suggesting safety concerns.
. Similarly, adverse outcomes observed in repeated-dose, reproductive, and developmental toxicity studies were either secondary to systemic toxicity, inconsistent, or unrelated to endocrine modes of action. Epidemiological findings suggesting associations with breast cancer, diabetes, or obesity were limited by methodological uncertainties and lack of causal inference. Collectively, the WoE demonstrates that PO should not be classified as an endocrine-disrupting chemical for humans or wildlife, although data gaps remain for environmental receptors and metabolites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: