Evaluates parcel-scale low impact development effectiveness for flood mitigation in urban-coastal areas, suggesting improved resilience against flooding.
Flooding along the U.S. coastline has become increasingly frequent due to the combined effects of intense rainfall and tide. In fully developed urban-coastal areas, constructing large-scale detention facilities or expanding stormwater networks is often infeasible. In this context, distributed, small-scale measures such as low impact development (LID) practices represent a complementary, community-driven approach to supplement conventional drainage infrastructure by capturing runoff on both public and private properties to enhance flood resilience. This study evaluates the potential of parcel-scale LID in mitigating compound flooding under different rainfall intensities and tidal conditions in an urban-coastal watershed. A hydrodynamic model was developed for a watershed in Norfolk, Virginia to simulate interactions between overland flow and drainage networks across a range of LID adoption scenarios. Results show the extent to which LID practices can reduce flood extent from a 1-year compound flooding event, particularly for inland areas primarily affected by pluvial compound flooding. For example, under the 1-year event, flood extent in the case study inland area was reduced by an average of 43% across scenarios, which is 3.57 times the reduction observed for the entire study area. Overall, parcel-scale LID in urban-coastal watersheds may provide a complementary mitigation strategy, especially for low return period nuisance flooding events in systems with similar hydrologic and infrastructure characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: