Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates the effects of dental pulp-derived stem cells on endometriosis lesions in rats, suggesting a novel therapeutic approach.
Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory disease sustained by aberrant angiogenesis and progressive fibrosis. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of human dental pulp–derived mesenchymal stem cells (DP-MSCs) in a surgically induced rat endometriosis model. Twenty-eight adult female Wistar rats were randomized (n = 7/group) to sham group (G1), untreated endometriosis-group (G2), single-dose DP-MSCs-group (G3) (2 × 106 cells intraperitoneally on day 28) and double-dose DP-MSCs-group (G4) (2 × 106 cells on days 28 and 35). Endometriosis was induced by autologous uterine tissue implantation onto the peritoneal wall and allowed to establish for 28 days; treatment effects were assessed 7 days after the final DP-MSCs dose. Serum and peritoneal TNF-α, IL-6, VEGF, and CA-125 were quantified; lesions were evaluated by semi-quantitative histopathology and fibrosis grading and by immunohistochemistry for CA-125, VEGF, type I collagen (Col1), and TNF-α. Untreated endometriosis showed increased systemic TNF-α (p = 0.0207) and IL-6 (p = 0.0003) and marked peritoneal elevations versus sham (all p < 0.0001). DP-MSCs treatment significantly reduced peritoneal TNF-α and IL-6 in both regimens (each p < 0.0001 vs untreated) and decreased peritoneal VEGF, with greater suppression after double dosing (p = 0.0100 between regimens). Double dosing produced stronger systemic TNF-α suppression (p = 0.0027 vs untreated). Histopathology and fibrosis improved, most prominently with double dosing (both p < 0.0001), accompanied by reduced CA-125, VEGF, Col1 and TNF-α immunoreactivity (CA-125 and TNF-α, p < 0.0001). DP-MSCs effectively resolve the hallmark pathological features of endometriosis in a dose-dependent manner. By synergistically targeting inflammatory, angiogenic, and fibrotic pathways, this cell-based strategy offers a potent, disease-modifying approach for clinical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hortu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: