Retrospective cohort study compares disease-free survival in breast cancer patients receiving two radiation types, indicating caution for IORT.
Abstract Purpose Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) with electrons is associated with higher ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates in early-stage breast cancer than whole-breast external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Although limited randomized and retrospective data suggest that this approach may suit a subset of patients, its role remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare oncological outcomes between technically optimal IORT with electrons and whole-breast EBRT in suitable breast cancer patients. Methods and Materials In this single-center retrospective cohort study, patients were grouped by radiation treatment: IORT with electrons or whole-breast EBRT. Endpoints included disease-free survival (DFS), local control, and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Results From January 2011 to December 2021, 204 eligible patients were reviewed (IORT, 74; EBRT, 130). The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 5-year DFS rates were 95.61% for IORT and 98.08% for EBRT (log-rank P = 0.02). The 5-year local control rates were 98.46% for IORT and 100% (no event) for EBRT (log-rank P = 0.07). The 5-year BCSS rates were comparable: 98.61% for IORT and 100% (no event) for EBRT (log-rank P = 0.23). On univariable analysis for DFS, receipt of systemic treatment was a statistically significant protective factor (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.74). Receipt of whole-breast EBRT was associated with a reduced risk of events, although this did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02–1.01). Conclusions IORT with electrons was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in 5-year DFS in appropriately selected patients compared with whole-breast EBRT, while BCSS remained comparable between groups. Therefore, electron-based IORT should be approached with caution and reserved for patients who prioritize treatment convenience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jitwatcharakomol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: