Defines the digital thread and its essential requirements, guiding the design of digital solutions.
This paper aims to define the digital thread through a system model consisting of four interacting subsystems: integration, ontology, storage, and access. These are embedded in lifecycle, marketplace, and regulatory contexts. From this model, five essential requirements are derived: standardized semantics, lifecycle integration, end-to-end traceability, secure and usable access, and scalable infrastructure. This system-level framing offers greater clarity than prior lifecycle or policy-driven views, highlighting the tradeoffs between centralized usability and decentralized trust. A review of contemporary solutions shows that while cloud platforms, APIs, and role-based access are widely implemented, they fall short in areas such as federated identity, cross-organizational policy enforcement and operational usability. The contribution of this work lies in synthesizing requirements from a coherent system definition, thereby guiding the design of resilient digital thread solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordholm et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: