White paper analyzes technological augmentation in humans, proposing an ethical framework for integration.
This white paper defines the augmented human as a person who incorporates, in a persistent and non-accessory manner, technological extensions that modify their cognitive, sensory, motor or agential capacity. Four convergent vectors of augmentation are analysed: brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) from companies such as Neuralink, Synchron and Blackrock Neurotech; medical and industrial exoskeletons; permanent personal AI agents; and sensory neural prostheses. The central philosophical question of the period —how far does a human remain human when a growing share of their functions is assisted or executed by integrated technology?— is examined, and a five-principle ethical framework is proposed. The paper argues that Latin America holds the conditions to constitute itself as a regional hub of the field, provided it consolidates a regulatory framework, public investment and specific clinical training over the next five years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Meniw (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: