PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026Acta Paediatrica0 citations

Response to the Critique by Edmiston et al., Banos et al. and Sandri et al. of Ruuska et al.

View Full Paper
SRSami-Matti RuuskaTampere UniversityKTKatinka TuiskuUniversity of HelsinkiTHTimo HolttinenTampere University

Key Points

  • This study examines the long-term psychiatric treatment contact for gender reassignment groups compared to controls.
  • Utilized data from Findata under specific licensing conditions.
  • Analyzed hazard ratios (HR) of psychiatric treatment contact ≥ 5 years after the index date.
  • Compared female controls and GD subjects with male controls as the reference group.
  • Significant HRs reported for psychiatric treatment contact among different gender reassignment groups versus controls.
  • Findings indicate variability in treatment needs post-gender reassignment as compared to female controls.

Abstract

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Findata. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from https://findata.fi with the permission of Findata. Table S1: Hazard Ratios (HR) (95% CI) for specialist-level psychiatric treatment contact ≥ 5 years after the index date among female controls and the different gender/gender reassignment (GR) groups among the GD subjects, with control males as the reference group. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ruuska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d234302fbce9130638ef9https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70618
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper