Key result
Infusional 5-fluorouracil linked to ~150% higher cardiac event risk than capecitabine, despite similar major events.
Why the study?
Data comparing the incidence of cardiac toxicities among different fluoropyrimidines in patients with gastrointestinal cancers were limited.
Does the choice of fluoropyrimidine affect the incidence of cardiac events in patients with gastrointestinal cancers?
Cohort (n=2,470)
No
Does the choice of fluoropyrimidine affect the incidence of cardiac events in patients with gastrointestinal cancers?
Odds Ratio: 2.5 (95% CI 1.24–5.51)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
The incidence of major cardiac toxicities with fluoropyrimidines in gastrointestinal cancer patients is low (1%) and similar between infusional 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine.
Cardiac toxicity rates with FP regimens in GI cancers remain uncertain; leaves open need for prospective comparative data.
Objectives: There is limited data comparing the incidences of cardiac toxicities with fluoropyrimidines (FP) in patients with gastrointestinal cancers (GI). Material and Methods: Patients with GI cancers treated with infusional 5 FU (IFL), capecitabine (C) and S1 between January 2023 and December 2023 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database at Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH) in Mumbai. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were evaluated. The primary endpoint of the study was estimation of all cardiac events in the study period and calculation of odds ratio (OR) for the relationship between baseline variables and the occurrence of all cardiac events. Major cardiac toxicities, was defined as cardiac abnormalities excluding asymptomatic self-limiting bradycardia or tachycardia. Results: A total of 2470 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria of the study, of whom 1342 patients (54%) received 5FU, 1071 received Cape (43%) and 55 received S1 (2%). Forty patients (1.6%) experienced a cardiac event, with the most common events being self-limiting bradycardia or tachycardia (15 events, 38%). The incidence of major cardiac toxicities was 1%. There were no differences in incidence of major cardiac events with IFL or C (1% each). The presence of hypertension [ 1.7% vs. 0.8%; OR - 2.27 (0.97–5.26) p = 0.06], diabetes mellitus [ 1.7% vs. 0.8%; OR - 2.38 (1.00–5.26), p = 0.051] and baseline cardiac dysfunction [ 3.1% vs. 0.9%; OR - 3.45 (1.00–11.1) p = 0.071] approached, but did not achieve statistical significance for the occurrence of major cardiac events. Conclusion: The incidence of cardiac abnormalities appears to be similar between IFL and capecitabine in patients with GI cancers. Cardiovascular comorbidities appeared to have weak correlation with the incidence of FP induced major cardiac events, highlighting the need for further research in this area of unmet need.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nirankari et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Gastrointestinal cancers (n=2,470). Infusional 5-fluorouracil vs. Capecitabine was evaluated on All cardiac events (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.24-5.51, p=<0.001). Infusional 5-fluorouracil was associated with a significantly higher risk of all cardiac events compared to capecitabine (OR 2.5), although the incidence of major cardiac events was similar.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: