This article seeks to critically engage the new literature on immigrant transnationalism.Connectivity between source and destination points is an inherent aspect of migrations, but migration networks generate a multiplicity of "imagined communities," organized along different, often conflicting principles.Consequently, what immigration scholars describe as transnationalism is usually its opposite: highly particularistic attachments antithetical to those by-products of globalization denoted by the concept of "transnational civil society."Moreover, migrants do not make their communities alone: states and state politics shape the options for migrant and ethnic trans-state social action.International migrants and their descendants do repeatedly engage in concerted action across state boundaries, but the use, form, and mobilization of the connections linking "here" and "there" are contingent outcomes subject to multiple political constraints.At the turn of the 21st century, globalization is the order of the day.With international migration bringing the alien "other" from third world to first, and worldwide trade and communications amplifying the feedbacks traveling in the opposite direction, the view that nation-state and society normally converge has waned.Instead, social scientists are looking for new ways to think about the connections between "here" and "there," as evidenced by the interest in the many things called transnational.Those studying international migration evince particular excitement.Observing that migration produces a plethora of connections spanning home and host societies, these scholars proclaim the emergence of transnational communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waldinger et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: