Why the study?
Data on the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic effect of 5-FU-associated coronary vasospasm were limited and conflicting.
Does 5-fluorouracil-associated coronary vasospasm affect progression-free or overall survival in patients receiving 5-FU regimens?
Does 5-fluorouracil-associated coronary vasospasm affect progression-free or overall survival in patients receiving 5-FU regimens?
5-FU-associated coronary vasospasm occurs in approximately 2% of patients, paradoxically affecting younger patients with fewer cardiovascular risk factors, but does not significantly impact overall or progression-free survival.
5-FU vasospasm does not affect survival in younger, lower-risk patients; leaves open optimal monitoring and prevention strategies.
BACKGROUND: Coronary vasospasm is a recognized side effect of 5-FU (fluorouracil). There are limited and conflicting data on the incidence, risk factors and prognostic effect of 5-FU associated vasospasm. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, risk factors and prognostic implications of 5-FU coronary vasospasm among patients receiving 5-FU regimens at a single tertiary care center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who received 5-FU at a single academic center from January 2009 to July 2019. Vasospasm was defined as the occurrence of a typical chest pain syndrome in the presence of 5-FU. The presence of associated electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and/or elevated biomarkers was used to further confirm the diagnosis. Patients with vasospasm were compared to patients treated with 5-FU without vasospasm in a 1:2 ratio. Data regarding demographics, medical history, and follow-up were collected by manual chart review. RESULTS: From approximately 4019 individual patients who received 5-FU from 2009 to 2019 at a single center, 87 (2.16%) developed vasospasm. Patients who developed vasospasm were younger (58±13 vs. 64±13 years, P = 0.001), and were less likely to have any cardiovascular risk factors (70.1% vs. 84.5%, P = 0.007). Patients with vasospasm and patients without vasospasm were otherwise similar in terms of types of cancer, stage of cancer, sex, and race. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival, overall mortality or cancer specific mortality between patients who developed vasospasm versus those who did not. CONCLUSION: In a large, single-center report of 5-FU associated vasospasm, patients who developed vasospasm were younger, had lower rates of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and had no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival compared to those who did not develop vasospasm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: