Why the study?
Does a 14-session biofeedback/cognitive self-management training program reduce diastolic blood pressure in white, male, unmedicated, borderline hypertensive subjects?
Does a 14-session biofeedback/cognitive self-management training program reduce diastolic blood pressure in white, male, unmedicated, borderline hypertensive subjects?
Lower baseline psychological distress, lower systolic blood pressure, and higher heart rate during mental tasks predict successful diastolic blood pressure reduction via biofeedback in borderline hypertensive men.
Baseline markers may guide selection for biofeedback trials; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
The purpose of this study was to determine which borderline hypertension subjects could succeed in self-regulating blood pressure, and to distinguish the psychologic and physiologic variables that predicted success. Thirty-four white, male, unmedicated, borderline hypertensive subjects participated in a 14-session biofeedback/cognitive self-management training program. Of these, 22 exited with diastolic pressure below 90 mm Hg; 12 exited equal to or above 90 mm Hg. Both groups exited with scores markedly lower on the Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90). The successful group began and ended on all cognitive/affective subscales at a lower level than the unsuccessful group. A discriminant analysis revealed that lower scores on the SCL-90, lower systolic blood pressures, and higher heart rates during a mental task at the beginning of treatment distinguished those who succeeded in self-regulation from those who could not succeed. The possible mechanisms for blood pressure control/change as a consequence of biofeedback are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakagawa‐Kogan et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: