Why the study?
Does interactive voice response (IVR) administration of the PHQ-9 provide similar assessment of depressive symptoms compared to paper-and-pencil administration in veterans with heart failure?
Does interactive voice response (IVR) administration of the PHQ-9 provide similar assessment of depressive symptoms compared to paper-and-pencil administration in veterans with heart failure?
IVR administration of the PHQ-9 is feasible and shows moderate agreement with paper administration, though it may require a lower threshold for detecting probable depression.
IVR PHQ-9 should not substitute for paper versions without adjustment in heart failure; leaves open validation of thresholds and reliability in telehealth.
We compared the administration of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess depressive symptoms using interactive voice response (IVR) technology with the method of administration using paper-and-pencil. Data were collected from 51 veterans participating in an 8-week randomized controlled trial of an illness management programme for heart failure. To counter possible bias in answering questions via IVR technology, the anchoring responses of the PHQ-9 questionnaire were reversed so that lower numbers corresponded to more severe depression. The mean for the pencil-and-paper administered PHQ-9 was 4.1 (SD = 4.5) and the mean for IVR administration was 2.8 (SD = 3.1). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of the PHQ-9 was 0.76 for IVR administration and 0.82 for paper administration. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the two modes of administration was 0.65, indicating moderate agreement. IVR administration of the PHQ-9 produces similar results to pencil-and-paper administration, but the former is not as sensitive to higher levels of depressive symptom severity. This suggests that a lower threshold for probable depression is warranted when assessing depressive symptoms with IVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Turvey et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: