Why the study?
Does a pattern recognition system using heart rate variability accurately classify stress compared to salivary biomarkers in volunteers?
Does a pattern recognition system using heart rate variability accurately classify stress compared to salivary biomarkers in volunteers?
Heart rate variability features analyzed with a fuzzy ARTMAP ensemble can noninvasively classify stress levels with 75-80% accuracy.
May support noninvasive stress monitoring in research; leaves open validation against biomarkers in clinical cohorts.
An accurate and noninvasive stress assessment from human physiology is a strenuous task. In this paper, a pattern recognition system to learn complex correlates between heart rate variability (HRV) features and salivary stress biomarkers is proposed. Using the Trier social stress test, heart rate and salivary measurements were obtained from volunteers under varying levels of stress induction. Measurements of salivary alpha-amylase and cortisol were used as objective measures of stress, and were correlated with the HRV features using fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM). In improving the predictive ability of the ARTMAPs, techniques, such as genetic algorithms for parameter optimization and voting ensembles, were employed. The ensemble of FAMs can be used for predicting stress responses of salivary alpha-amylase or cortisol using heart rate measurements as the input. Using alpha-amylase as the stress indicator, the ensemble was able to classify stress from heart rate features with 75% accuracy, and 80% accuracy when cortisol was used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liew et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: