PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1992Psychosomatic Medicine181 citations

Cardiovascular responses to an active coping challenge as predictors of blood pressure patterns 10 to 15 years later.

View Full Paper
KLKathleen C. LightCDCarol A. DolanMDMark R. Davis

Structured PICO

Does high cardiovascular reactivity to an active coping challenge predict higher blood pressure 10 to 15 years later in young men?

P
Population
51 men originally tested at age 18 to 22 years
I
Intervention
High cardiovascular reactivity (systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and heart rate) during an active coping challenge (reaction time task involving threat of shock)
C
Comparator
Low cardiovascular reactivity during the same challenge
O
Outcome
Blood pressure (stethoscopic and ambulatory) and heart rate at 10 to 15 years follow-upsurrogate

Cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in young adulthood independently predicts higher blood pressure levels 10 to 15 years later.

Abstract

To assess the long-term predictive importance of high cardiovascular reactivity in relation to subsequent blood pressure, 51 men from a pool of 204 men originally tested at age 18 to 22 years were recruited for blood pressure assessment 10 to 15 years later. Initial testing uniformly involved monitoring of systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and heart rate during a reaction time task involving threat of shock. In 30 of the 51 men who participated at follow-up, initial testing had also included separate visits to obtain relaxation-only baseline levels of the cardiovascular indices. At follow-up, in addition to clinic-type stethoscopic determinations, blood pressure and heart rate were assessed during work and social and leisure activities via ambulatory monitoring. Men with higher levels of systolic pressure during the task showed higher stethoscopic and ambulatory systolic pressure at follow-up. Likewise, men with higher levels of diastolic pressure during the task showed higher diastolic levels at follow-up. In the 30 men with both good task and baseline data from initial testing, those with high heart rate reactivity (task minus baseline) showed higher systolic, diastolic, and heart rate levels at follow-up than low heart rate reactors, even though their baseline blood pressures had not differed at initial testing. Similarly, men with high systolic reactivity showed higher diastolic pressure at follow-up than low systolic reactors. Multiple regression analyses also demonstrated that systolic, diastolic, and heart rate reactivity improve prediction of follow-up blood pressure when added to models incorporating the standard risk factors, baseline blood pressure, and parental history of hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Light et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d26d5750575be8d2f3960https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199203000-00007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Do Cardiovascular Responses to Active and Passive Coping Tasks predict Future Blood Pressure over a 10-Month Later?2016 · 3 citations
  2. 2Cardiovascular reactivity to and recovery from psychological challenge as predictors of 3-year change in blood pressure.2006 · 82 citations
  3. 3Blood Pressure Reactions to Acute Mental Stress and Future Blood Pressure Status2011 · 103 citations
  4. 4Anticipatory Blood Pressure Response to Exercise Predicts Future High Blood Pressure in Middle-aged Men1996 · 192 citations
  5. 5Cardiovascular Reactivity to Video Game Predicts Subsequent Blood Pressure Increases in Young Men1998 · 182 citations