Why the study?
Vasovagal syncope is the most common form of syncope, but whether the active stand test can identify patients with a positive head-up tilt test or clinical diagnosis of vasovagal syncope remains to be examined.
Does the active stand test combined with a machine learning framework accurately identify patients with a positive Head-Up Tilt Test or diagnosis of vasovagal syncope?
Does the active stand test combined with a machine learning framework accurately identify patients with a positive Head-Up Tilt Test or diagnosis of vasovagal syncope?
A machine learning framework analyzing hemodynamic responses to the active stand test can identify young patients with vasovagal syncope with 80.2% accuracy, potentially offering an alternative to the Head-Up Tilt Test.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive VVS identification in young patients via active stand test and ML; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common form of syncope, accounting for 50-60% of unexplained syncope. Currently diagnosis is achieved via clinical assessment combined with the Head-Up Tilt Test (HUT). Aim To examine the utility of the active stand test (AS) to identify those with a positive HUT or diagnosis of VVS. Design Retrospective study of hemodynamic responses to AS. Methods Continuous blood pressure responses to AS from 101 patients attending a Falls and Blackouts Unit were acquired, including: 37 controls (CON), 64 with a clinical diagnosis of VVS (VVS+) (34 tilt-positive (HUT+) and 30 tilt-negative (HUT-)) with a mean age of 25 ± 9 years. A total of 33 hemodynamic features were extracted with a subset of these entered into linear discriminant classifier. Classification accuracy was assessed using N-fold cross-validation. Results Results indicated that it was possible to classify the outcome of the HUT with sensitivity of 58.8%, specificity of 63.3% and an accuracy of 60.9%. Using a multivariate classifier it was possible to identify those with a positive diagnosis of VVS with a sensitivity of 84.3%, specificity of 72.9% and an accuracy of 80.2%. Conclusion This study highlights the existence of a unique AS hemodynamic response characterised by autonomic hypersensitivity exhibited by young patients prone to VVS which is detectable using a multi-parameter machine learning framework. With further verification, this approach may have applications in syncope and falls diagnosis, population studies and the tracking of treatment efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carmody et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: