Comparison of Supervised Learning Algorithms for Quality Assessment of Wearable Electrocardiograms With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Emerging wearable technology able to monitor electrocardiogram (ECG) continuously for long periods of time without disrupting the patient’s daily life represents a great opportunity to improve suboptimal current diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its integration into clinical practice is still limited because the acquired ECG recording is often strongly contaminated by transient noise, thus leading to numerous false alarms of AF and requiring manual interpretation of extensive amounts of ECG data. To improve this situation, automated selection of ECG segments with sufficient quality for precise diagnosis has been widely proposed, and numerous algorithms for such ECG quality assessment can be found. Although most have reported successful performance on ECG signals acquired from healthy subjects, only a recent algorithm based on a well-known pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN), such as AlexNet, has maintained a similar efficiency in the context of paroxysmal AF. Hence, having in mind the latest major advances in the development of neural networks, the main goal of this work was to compare the most recent pre-trained CNN models in terms of classification performance between high- and low-quality ECG excerpts and computational time. In global values, all reported a similar classification performance, which was significantly superior than the one provided by previous methods based on combining hand-crafted ECG features with conventional machine learning classifiers. Nonetheless, shallow networks (such as AlexNet) trended to detect better high-quality ECG excerpts and deep CNN models to identify better noisy ECG intervals. The networks with a moderate depth of about 20 layers presented the best balanced performance on both groups of ECG excerpts. Indeed, GoogLeNet (with a depth of 22 layers) obtained very close values of sensitivity and specificity about 87%. It also maintained a misclassification rate of AF episodes similar to AlexNet and an acceptable computation time, thus constituting the best alternative for quality assessment of wearable, long-term ECG recordings acquired from patients with paroxysmal AF.