Why the study?
TAVR may be used to urgently or emergently treat severe aortic stenosis, but outcomes for this high-risk population have not been well-characterized.
Does urgent or emergent TAVR worsen clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to elective TAVR in adults with severe aortic stenosis?
Does urgent or emergent TAVR worsen clinical outcomes and quality of life compared to elective TAVR in adults with severe aortic stenosis?
Urgent or emergent TAVR is associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury and non-improved short-term quality of life compared to elective TAVR, though adjusted 1-year mortality is similar.
Urgent/emergent TAVR may warrant caution in shared decisions; leaves open whether randomized trials would alter mortality findings.
BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be used to urgently or emergently treat severe aortic stenosis, but outcomes for this high-risk population have not been well-characterized. We sought to describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients undergoing urgent or emergent vs. elective TAVR.MethodsWe identified all adults who received TAVR for primary aortic stenosis between 2013 and 2019 within an integrated health care delivery system in Northern California. Elective or urgent/emergent procedure status was based on standard Society of Thoracic Surgeons definitions. Data were obtained from electronic health records, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry, and state/national reporting databases. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were performed.ResultsAmong 1564 eligible adults that underwent TAVR, 81 (5.2%) were classified as urgent/emergent. These patients were more likely to have heart failure (63.0% vs. 47.4%), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (21.0% vs. 11.8%), or a prior aortic valve balloon valvuloplasty (13.6% vs. 5.0%) and experienced higher unadjusted rates of 30-day and 1-year morbidity and mortality. Urgent/emergent TAVR status was independently associated with non-improved quality of life at 30-days (hazard ratio, 4.87; p < 0.01) and acute kidney injury within 1-year post-TAVR (hazard ratio, 2.11; p = 0.01). There was not a significant difference in adjusted 1-year mortality with urgent/emergent TAVR.ConclusionsUrgent/emergent TAVR status was uncommon and associated with high-risk clinical features and higher unadjusted rates of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Procedure status may be useful to identify patients less likely to experience significant short term improvement in health-related quality of life post-TAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slade et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: