Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article discusses deeply rooted linguistic comparisons as stereotypical images in the form of name-callings. A very common element of these comparisons are animals as living beings with their own characteristics, living in a common environment: A human characteristic is compared to a prescribed, but not necessarily intrinsic, characteristic of a particular animal. The characteristics ascribed to animals are socially stereotyped and disseminated as generalised images using a metaphorical language that form so-called collective symbols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saša Babič (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: