Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper considers the consequences, intended and unintended, of the present arrangements for the assurance of quality of teaching and research in British higher education. It proposes an alternative approach, based on the concept of clinical audit as applied to the National Health Service. The advantages of such an approach are claimed to lie in (i) recognising the interconnectedness of activities within higher education institutions, (ii) addressing real organisational problems, and (iii) identifying where responsibility for solving them lies. By rendering organisational processes explicit and having recourse to evidence at all stage of the cycle, can render unproblematic the demands of external quality agencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brennan et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: