Why the study?
Does echocardiographic assessment of LV midwall mechanics yield different conclusions about LV systolic function than endocardial mechanics in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Does echocardiographic assessment of LV midwall mechanics yield different conclusions about LV systolic function than endocardial mechanics in spontaneously hypertensive rats?
Assessment of midwall mechanics by echocardiography provides a better understanding of LV performance in spontaneously hypertensive rats, revealing that exaggerated endocardial motion does not represent truly supernormal systolic performance.
Caution warranted interpreting endocardial shortening in hypertensive models; animal data leaves open clinical value of midwall assessment.
AIMS: The present study was attempted to determine whether LV midwall mechanics yielded different conclusions about LV systolic function than the assessment of endocardial LV mechanics by echocardiography in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-six (18 Wistar normotensive (W), 18 [SHR]) anesthetized rats were studied with two-dimensional directed M-mode echocardiogram to analyze LV structure (LV diameter, left ventricular wall thickness and LV mass [LVM]) and LV function (endocardial shortening [ES] and midwall shortening [MS]). Measurements were made from three consecutive cardiac cycles on the M-mode tracings. There was no significant difference in LV dimension. LVM was higher in SHR (SHR: 595 +/- 111 mg, W: 413 +/- 83 mg--p < 0.01). ES was higher in SHR (SHR: 64.1 +/- 6%, w: 58.2 +/- 4%--p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was found in MS (SHR: 24 +/- 4%, W: 27.6 +/- 4%--ns). Twelve of 18 (66%) SHR showed endocardial shortening higher than normally predicted, compared with 3/18 (16%) with observed enhanced MS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the analysis of midwall mechanics by echo allows us to better understand the LV performance in SHR and that the exaggerated endocardial motion could not represent a really supernormal systolic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esther Escudero (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: