Why the study?
Traditional cuff-based sphygmomanometers are accurate and reliable but require bulky equipment and technical skills, driving interest in convenient photoplethysmography and contactless remote photoplethysmography monitoring.
This review highlights the potential of PPG and rPPG technologies as convenient, unobtrusive alternatives to traditional cuff-based blood pressure monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Encourages multi-feature rPPG exploration for unobtrusive BP monitoring; leaves open prospective clinical validation before any practice change.
Blood pressure (BP) determines whether a person has hypertension and offers implications as to whether he or she could be affected by cardiovascular disease. Cuff-based sphygmomanometers have traditionally provided both accuracy and reliability, but they require bulky equipment and relevant skills to obtain precise measurements. BP measurement from photoplethysmography (PPG) signals has become a promising alternative for convenient and unobtrusive BP monitoring. Moreover, the recent developments in remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) algorithms have enabled new innovations for contactless BP measurement. This paper illustrates the evolution of BP measurement techniques from the biophysical theory, through the development of contact-based BP measurement from PPG signals, and to the modern innovations of contactless BP measurement from rPPG signals. We consolidate knowledge from a diverse background of academic research to highlight the importance of multi-feature analysis for improving measurement accuracy. We conclude with the ongoing challenges, opportunities, and possible future directions in this emerging field of research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Man et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: