Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study, conducted in 2005 to 2007, presents results that are based on a proscriptive cohort design. The sample consisted of 769 residents in 22 drug user treatment programs who stayed in treatment for at least 30 days to one year; 510 former residents (66%) from 21 programs (95%) were interviewed again at a 6-month post-treatment follow-up assessment. A majority of the participants were male, lived with family or relatives, had completed only primary school, and had a full-time or a part-time job prior to entering treatment. The participating therapeutic community (TC) programs were a mixture of volunteer, compulsory-probation, and prison-based programs. In-person interview data and urine testing showed that the self-reported drug use prevalence rates are reliable. The results show large positive treatment effects on 30-day and 6-month illegal drug use and small to medium effects on the severity of alcohol use and related problems. A multilevel regression analysis suggests that residents' reduced stigma, adaptation of the TC model, and frequency of alcohol and drug use-related consequences partially predict treatment success. Study limitations and policy implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: