Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of the article is to assess how sustainable construction, grounded in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Zero Carbon Footprint principles, can guide Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction. Methodology: mixed-methods design combining a stakeholder survey and semi-structured interviews with an LCA of a representative public building using One Click LCA. Results: the case study achieves a 56.6% cut in annual energy use (1 214 000 → 527 150 kWh); district heating and stationary fuels dominate CO₂ (55.7% and 44.3%). Survey evidence shows limited LCA awareness and low practical uptake; key barriers are insufficient financial incentives and incomplete regulation. Discussion: we argue for alignment with EU standards, prioritizing thermal retrofits, heating-system modernization, professional training, and targeted incentives to accelerate adoption. Embedding LCA in energy management delivers environmental and economic co-benefits and strengthens infrastructure resilience. This study is based on a sample of n = 45 respondents, with a functional unit defined as the building’s operational energy performance over 60 years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lousada et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: