Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1995Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

A comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques, including three that are not reference-site dependent

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

EFEdward H. FieldUnited States Geological SurveyKJKlaus JacobLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Field et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1d363673c56dd1bd2f5dfchttps://doi.org/10.1785/bssa0850041127
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Least Squares Method For Objective Determination of Earthquake Source Parameters1991 · 48 citations
  2. 2Limits of sensitivity of inertial seismometers with velocity transducers and electronic amplifiers1990 · 57 citations
  3. 38. The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—Natural Period of Sites in the Valley of Mexico from Microtremor Measurements and Strong Motion Data1988 · 83 citations
  4. 42. Monte‐Carlo Simulation of the Theoretical Site Response Variability at Turkey Flat, California, Given the Uncertainty in the Geotechnically Derived Input Parameters1993 · 45 citations
  5. 5Earthquake site-response study in Giumri (formerly Leninakan), Armenia, using ambient noise observations1995 · 69 citations