Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To answer the question “are small selective databases now redundant”, a comparison was made between the smaller, more selective reaction databases [under ISIS (Integrated Scientific Information System)] and a larger, more comprehensive database (Beilstein, via CrossFire) using references, exact reactions, named reactions, and transformations. The results show a large overlap of reference data with a smaller overlap of reaction data. Depending on the search, the overall view is that the databases are complementary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parkar et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: