Why the study?
Does electrocardiogram-gated multidetector CT provide comparable left ventricular functional measurements to gated SPECT?
Does electrocardiogram-gated multidetector CT provide comparable left ventricular functional measurements to gated SPECT?
Multidetector CT, particularly 64-row, correlates well with gated SPECT for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes, though SPECT yields slightly lower volumes.
Supports gated 64-row CT for LV EF assessment; leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical substitution for SPECT.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) from electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography (CT) to gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients underwent electrocardiogram-gated multidetector CT and SPECT examinations within a 3-month period, without interim cardiac events. The LV EF, EDV, and ESV were compared. RESULTS: There was an excellent correlation between LV EF obtained from CT (60.25% +/- 12.93%) and SPECT (61.90% +/- 14.93%) (r = 0.81), with no significant difference (P = 0.17). Computed tomography-derived EDV and ESV correlated well with SPECT (r = 0.88 and 0.94, respectively). The EDV from SPECT (132.21 +/- 67.10 mL) was significantly lower than that from CT (147.53 +/- 55.03 mL; P = 0.0007); there was a trend for ESV from SPECT (58.39 +/- 61.20 mL) to be lower than that from CT (63.79 +/- 53.58 mL; P = 0.055). The EF, EDV, and ESV correlation of SPECT with the 64-row multidetector CT was better (r = 0.87, 0.89, and 0.96, respectively) than that with the 16-row CT (r = 0.36, 0.66, and 0.49, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There is a good correlation between LV EF, EDV, and ESV from gated SPECT and CT (particularly the 64-row CT). The LV volumes are lower on SPECT than on CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: