In recent years, an issue that has received plenty of national publicity in Singapore is the growing trend for well-educated women to remain single. The oft-cited reason for the trend is male dispreference for marrying women of an equal or higher educational standing than themselves. Arising from this situation, a series of `educational' ads was launched by the government. In this study, two such ads are closely analysed within a critical discourse analysis approach which draws upon M.A.K. Halliday's functional grammar. I argue that although one of the ads contains potential ingredients for correcting male chauvinism and promoting true gender equality, the ads taken as a set are really concerned with maintaining the social status quo between the sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelle M. Lazar (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: