Why the study?
Does geographical distance to coronary angiography laboratories impact patient evaluation pathways and outcomes in patients with suspected CAD?
Does geographical distance to coronary angiography laboratories impact patient evaluation pathways and outcomes in patients with suspected CAD?
Increased geographical distance to tertiary cardiology centers is associated with fewer direct invasive investigations and higher relative mortality in patients with suspected CAD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distance to angiography labs may limit invasive evaluations and worsen outcomes in suspected CAD; leaves open whether targeted access interventions improve equity.
INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been a leading cause of death in the western world for the last few decades, despite significant improvements in treatment and management. Diagnostic algorithms for the evaluation of patients with suspected CAD are based on available guidelines. AIM: To evaluate the impact of geographical distances to coronary angiography laboratories on the patient evaluation pathways in patients with suspected CAD, from a population-based study in Hungary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Depersonalised data of 29,202 patients identified by their pseudo-social security number were analysed. All patients underwent coronary angiography as an initial direct invasive investigation (DI) following an at least half-year-long stable period between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2008. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five dominant primary cardiology centres (PCC) have been identified, from which 85 proved to have sample size more than 100 DIs in tertiary cardiology centres (TCC). The frequency of DIs showed a close correlation with PCC-TCC distances (r = -0.44, p < 0.001). A negative correlation could be demonstrated between the age of patients and PCC-TCC distances (r = -0.45, p < 0.001). Without significant change in the absolute mortality, the relative mortality increased with the increase in PCC-TCC distance (r = 0.25, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PCC-TCC distance has an important effect on patient pathways in subjects with suspected CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemes et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: