Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surface characteristics of the {111} crystallographic planes of the III–V intermetallic compounds (zinc‐blende structure), and in particular those of , are discussed. The polarity of these compounds along the 〈111〉 directions leads to pronounced physical chemical differences between the {111} surfaces terminating with group III atoms and those terminating with group V atoms. Differences in etching, dislocation etch pit formation, and electrode potential are presented. Dislocation etch pits form on the group III surfaces and not on the group V surfaces of the six compounds investigated (, , , , , and ). A proposed interpretation is based on the relative reactivity of the group III and group V atoms as affected by their bond configuration and the polarity of the zinc‐blende structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gatos et al. (1960) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: