Why the study?
The study was designed to examine relationships between the established single-item days per week question and meeting physical activity guidelines defined by the single-item hours question and IPAQ.
Does the single-item days per week question accurately reflect meeting physical activity guidelines compared to IPAQ and SI-hours questions in a population survey?
Does the single-item days per week question accurately reflect meeting physical activity guidelines compared to IPAQ and SI-hours questions in a population survey?
The single-item days per week question is a valid measure for physical activity surveillance, with a cut point of at least 3 days per week best reflecting the achievement of physical activity guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports single-item days question for PA surveillance; extends brief measure validation in cross-sectional surveys.
BACKGROUND: Sport New Zealand conducts continuous representative "Active NZ" surveys. Between 2019 and 2020 (n = 13,887), these surveys asked International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-long-form questions, the single-item days (SI-days) per week question, and 1 question on hours per week (single-item hours [SI-hours] per week). This study examines relationships between the established SI-days question and meeting physical activity (PA) guidelines (150 min moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week from SI-hours question and IPAQ). METHODS: Analyses were descriptive, and the best fit between SI-days and the PA thresholds was estimated using area under the receiver operator characteristic curves and Youden index. RESULTS: Using SI-hours, 60.6% achieved 150+ minutes; 85.2% reported the IPAQ-total minimum threshold, and 40.8% met the IPAQ-leisure time PA-only threshold. Receiver operator characteristic analyses showed area under the curve values with IPAQ between 0.63 and 0.76, but the SI-days showed a very good area under the curve of 0.82 (0.81-0.83) with the SI-hours 150-minute threshold. Youden index suggested the best fit was at 3+ days per week for maximizing Sensitivity and Specificity to meet IPAQ or SI-hours-defined PA guidelines. DISCUSSION: The SI-days per week question reflects achieving PA guidelines, and the best fit was with the SI-hours per week question. This provides surveillance-relevant concurrent validity for the SI-days measure, but the cut point for broadly meeting guidelines appears to be at least 3 days per week, not 5 days per week as previously thought.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bauman et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: