Key result
Treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors immediately after diagnosis is a dominant strategy that reduces costs and increases quality-adjusted life years compared to screening, with a 70% probability of savings.
Why the study?
Does treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors improve cost-effectiveness compared to screening for albuminuria in the Netherlands?
Does treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors improve cost-effectiveness compared to screening for albuminuria in the Netherlands?
Treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors is highly cost-effective and dominates screening strategies for albuminuria in the Netherlands.
May support immediate ACE inhibitor use in new type 2 diabetes for cost and QALY gains; leaves open prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes is the main cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Europe and the USA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have a potential to slow down the progression of renal disease and therefore provide a renal-protective effect. The aim of our study was to assess the most cost-effective time to start an ACE inhibitor (or an angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB] if coughing as a side effect occurs) in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in The Netherlands. METHODS: A lifetime Markov decision model with simulated 50-year-old patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus was developed using published data on costs and health outcomes and simulating the progression of renal disease. A health insurance perspective was adopted. Three strategies were compared: treating all patients at the time of diagnosing type 2 diabetes, screening for microalbuminuria, and screening for macroalbuminuria. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the treat-all strategy is associated with the lowest costs and highest benefit and therefore dominates screening both for macroalbuminuria and microalbuminuria. A multivariate sensitivity analysis shows that the probability of savings is 70%. CONCLUSIONS: In The Netherlands for patients with type 2 diabetes prescription of an ACE inhibitor immediately after diagnosis should be considered if they do not have contraindications. An ARB should be considered for those patients developing a dry cough under ACE inhibitor therapy. The potential for cost savings would be even larger if the prevention of cardiovascular events were considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adarkwah et al. (2011) studied Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n=1,000). ACE inhibitors (or ARBs if coughing occurs) vs. Screening for microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors immediately after diagnosis is a dominant strategy that reduces costs and increases quality-adjusted life years compared to screening, with a 70% probability of savings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: