Key result
Treating all patients with type 2 diabetes with ACE inhibitors immediately at diagnosis dominated screening strategies, yielding an 89% probability of cost savings.
Why the study?
Does treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors/ARBs improve cost-effectiveness compared to screening for albuminuria?
Does treating all newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with ACE inhibitors/ARBs improve cost-effectiveness compared to screening for albuminuria?
Initiating ACE inhibitors immediately upon diagnosis of type 2 diabetes is a cost-saving strategy compared to waiting for albuminuria to develop.
May support immediate ACE inhibitor use at type 2 diabetes diagnosis; leaves open need for trial confirmation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Type 2 diabetes is the main cause of end-stage renal disease in Europe and the United States. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors slow down the progression of renal disease and, therefore, provide a renal-protective effect. The aim of this study was to assess the most cost-effective time to start an ACE inhibitor (or an angiotensin II receptor blocker in the event of cough) in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. METHODS: Three strategies were compared: treating all patients at the time of diagnosing type 2 diabetes, screening for microalbuminuria, and screening for macroalbuminuria. A lifetime Markov decision model with simulated 50-year-old patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus was developed using published data on costs and health outcomes and simulating the progression of renal disease. A statutory health insurance perspective was adopted. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the treat-all strategy is associated with the lowest costs and highest benefit and, therefore, dominates screening both for macroalbuminuria and microalbuminuria. A multivariate sensitivity analysis shows that the probability of savings is 89 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type 2 diabetes should receive an ACE inhibitor immediately after diagnosis if they do not have contraindications. The potential for cost savings would be even larger if the prevention of cardiovascular events were considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adarkwah et al. (2010) studied Type 2 diabetes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers at diagnosis vs. Screening for microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria was evaluated on Costs and health outcomes. Treating all patients with type 2 diabetes with ACE inhibitors immediately at diagnosis dominated screening strategies, yielding an 89% probability of cost savings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: