Key result
Discharge on postoperative day 3 or ≥4 after unscheduled cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of maternal readmission or unscheduled visits compared with day 2 (aOR 2.6 and 2.9).
Why the study?
Despite policies mandating minimum hospital stays to reduce readmissions after cesarean delivery, the effectiveness of this approach remains uncertain.
Does discharge on POD 3 or ≥4 reduce the composite of maternal readmission, unscheduled clinic, or ER visit within 6 weeks of delivery in women following unscheduled cesarean delivery compared with discharge on POD 2?
Cohort
Yes
Does discharge on POD 3 or ≥4 reduce the composite of maternal readmission, unscheduled clinic, or ER visit within 6 weeks of delivery in women following unscheduled cesarean delivery compared with discharge on POD 2?
Effect estimate: aOR 2.6 (POD 3); aOR 2.9 (POD ≥4) (95% CI 1.3-5.3 (POD 3); 1.3-6.4 (POD ≥4))
p-value: p=0.03
Discharge on postoperative day 3 or later after uncomplicated but unscheduled cesarean delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal readmission or unscheduled visits compared to discharge on day 2.
May support POD 2 discharge to minimize visits after unscheduled cesarean; leaves open causal effects in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: Despite legislation and hospital policies (present in some institutions) mandating a minimum length of stay in an effort to decrease the frequency of hospital readmissions, the effectiveness of this approach remains uncertain.We hypothesized that following cesarean delivery (CD), the rates of maternal readmission or unscheduled health care visits are lower in patients discharged on postoperative day (POD) 3 or ≥4 as compared with those discharged earlier on POD 2. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial comparing adjunctive azithromycin for unscheduled CD to prevent infection. Groups were compared based on the duration of hospitalization measured in days from delivery (POD 0) to day of discharge and categorized as POD 2, 3, and ≥4. The primary outcome was the composite of any maternal postpartum readmission, unscheduled clinic, or emergency room (ER) visit, within 6 weeks of delivery. Secondary outcomes included components of the primary outcome and neonatal readmissions. We excluded women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and infections diagnosed prior to POD 2. RESULTS: = 0.03). The primary outcome increased with later discharge (POD ≥4 when compared with POD 2). Among components of the composite, ER and unscheduled clinic visits, but not maternal readmissions, increased with the timing of discharge for patients discharged on POD ≥4 when compared with POD 2. Using logistic regression, discharge on POD 3 and on POD ≥4 was significantly associated with the composite (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.3-5.3]; aOR 2.9, 95% CI [1.3-6.4], respectively) compared with POD 2. CONCLUSION: The risk of maternal readmission composite following uncomplicated but unscheduled CD was not lower in patients discharged home on POD 3 or ≥4 compared with patients discharged earlier (POD 2). KEY POINTS: · Risk of maternal readmission is higher in patients discharged on POD 3 or 4 compared with POD 2.. · No significant differences by the timing of discharge were observed for any neonatal readmissions.. · Timing of discharge should include an individualized approach with the option of discharge by POD 2..
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oben et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Unscheduled cesarean delivery. Discharge on postoperative day 3 or ≥4 vs. Discharge on postoperative day 2 was evaluated on Composite of any maternal postpartum readmission, unscheduled clinic, or emergency room (ER) visit, within 6 weeks of delivery (aOR 2.6 (POD 3); aOR 2.9 (POD ≥4), 95% CI 1.3-5.3 (POD 3); 1.3-6.4 (POD ≥4), p=0.03). Discharge on postoperative day 3 or ≥4 after unscheduled cesarean delivery was associated with a higher risk of maternal readmission or unscheduled visits compared with day 2 (aOR 2.6 and 2.9).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: