This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PERSPECTIVES AND SUMMARy ......... .. ........ . ...... 615 HISTORy ....... ...... . . . . . ...... . . .. .... . . . .. . 616 INDIVIDUAL G PROTEINS: FUNCTIONS AND MOLECULAR ENTITIES 617 Criter ia for In volvemen t o f a G Pr otein ..... ......... 618 Func ti on s R egu la ted b y G Protein s ... . .... . ... . . . .. .. 619 M olecu lar En tities and S truc ture . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .... . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . 622 LIGAND--G PROTEIN INTERACTIONS 63 1 LIGAND-REGULATED PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS 634 Receptor-O Protein J nteractions. . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . ........ . ..... . ... . ...... . . . . . . . . . 634 G Pr otein -Effec tor In teraction s . . . . ....... . . . .. .. ... . . . . . . . ... . .... . .. . . . ...... . .. ....... .... . . 638 G PROTEIN-MEMBRANE INTERACTIONS 643 COVALENT MODIFICATION OF G PROTEINS 644
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfred G. Gilman (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: