Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of a 1-week treatment regimen of ciprofloxacin otic drops (0.2%), with or without hydrocortisone, or polymyxin B-neomycin-hydrocortisone otic suspension (PNH) were compared in patients with acute diffuse otitis externa of less than 3 weeks' duration. Eight hundred forty-two patients aged ≥2 years were enrolled. Of 703 patients valid for efficacy analysis (239 ciprofloxacin alone [CIP Soln], 236 ciprofloxacin plus hydrocortisone [CIP/HC Susp], 228 PNH), clinical resolution or improvement was observed in 93%, 90%, and 87% of CIP Soln-, CIP/HC Susp-, and PNH-treated patients, respectively. Estimated median time-to-end of ear pain was 4.7 days (CIP Soln), 3.8 days (CIP/HC Susp), and 4.1 days (PNH). CIP/HC Susp-treated patients had a significantly shorter time-to-end of ear pain than did CIP Soln-treated patients (P = .039). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common pathogen in all three treatment groups (67%). Bacteriologic eradication at the end of therapy was achieved in 92%, 95%, and 87% of CIP Soln-, CIP/HC Susp-, and PNH-treated patients, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated with similar rates of drug-related adverse events, ranging from 5% to 6%. Ciprofloxacin otic drops, with or without hydrocortisone, were as effective as PNH in the treatment of acute otitis externa. The addition of hydrocortisone to ciprofloxacin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the time-to-end of ear pain when compared with ciprofloxacin alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pistorius et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: