Key result
Aspirin is supported by key evidence for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes, whereas its role in primary prevention should be based on individual cardiovascular risk.
Why the study?
Does aspirin prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes?
Does aspirin prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes?
Aspirin remains a cornerstone for secondary prevention of CVD in diabetes, whereas its use in primary prevention requires individualized risk assessment and potentially modified dosing strategies.
Supports aspirin for secondary CVD prevention in diabetes; leaves open refined primary prevention strategies.
Diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. The role for aspirin in diabetes is of high clinical interest. Guidelines recommend that primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetes with aspirin should be based on the individual risk for CVD. New mechanistic studies suggest that enhanced platelet turnover may partly contribute to the fact the primary prevention studies found unequivocal results in diabetes. There is initial evidence that a potential future modification of dosages in diabetes may counteract the enhancement in platelet turnover in diabetes. The use of aspirin in diabetic patients for secondary prevention of CVD is supported by key evidence. The aim of the review is to present recent studies on aspirin for prevention of CVD in diabetes and to highlight its role also in view of new mechanistic and clinical studies with aspirin. Novel aspects of aspirin, e.g. its potential role for the prevention of cancer, are also presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnell et al. (2012) conducted a review in Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Aspirin was evaluated. Aspirin is supported by key evidence for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes, whereas its role in primary prevention should be based on individual cardiovascular risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: