Key result
Working memory neural patterns explain ~30% of variance in self-reported thought control difficulties.
Why the study?
Difficulties controlling thoughts are a transdiagnostic feature of mental health disorders, but the specific distributed neural patterns and functional connectivity associated with these individual differences required investigation.
Cross-Sectional (n=48)
No
Specific patterns of brain activity distributed within and across four different brain networks are associated with an individual's difficulties in controlling thoughts.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Distinct configurations of distributed representations, as well as patterns of functional connectivity within specific neural networks, are related to an individual’s difficulty in controlling their thoughts. • Individuals with greater thought control difficulties exhibit poorer and less distinct neural representations of working memory control operations, as reflected by lower multi-voxel pattern analysis classifier accuracy. • Cortical gradient-based organizational characteristics across the four WM-control operations within specific networks, particularly the default mode network, are related to greater thought control difficulties. • Integrating neural representational characteristics with connectivity patterns significantly improved the explanation of individual differences in thought control difficulties, with the best-performing model accounting for over 30% of the variance in these difficulties. • Neural pattern associations with thought control difficulties were specific to WM-control operations, suggesting that disruptions in thought control reflect how the brain organizes information during active focus rather than general disorganization in other mental states. • Our findings may provide insights into what brain systems may be contributing to such repetitive thoughts, the management of which is often a focus on behavioral interventions such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). • They may also offer researchers and clinicians a quantifiable, interpretable biomarker to assess whether interventions “normalize” the neural organization required for managing information held in mind. This study identified specific patterns of brain activity distributed within and across four different brain networks associated with an individual’s difficulties in controlling thoughts, a transdiagnostic feature of mental health disorders. Previously, we demonstrated that four working memory control operations—maintaining, replacing, suppressing, and clearing thoughts—are represented by distinct multi-voxel patterns of brain activation. Moreover, the exact pattern that characterizes these operations is distinct across four sets of brain regions, referred to as Working Memory Operation Networks, that include a Visual Network (VN), Somatomotor network (SMN), Default Mode network (DMN), and Frontoparietal Control network (FPCN). The current study examined the hypothesis that aspects of these multi-voxel patterns are associated with an individual’s difficulty in controlling thoughts, as derived from a composite of three self-report questionnaires, in a non-clinical (N = 48) sample. Consistent with our hypothesis, three effects were observed. Individuals with higher levels of thought-control difficulty have less distinct multi-voxel patterns for each of the four operations, have a less distinct representation of the suppression and clear operations in the DMN network from its representations in other networks, and have a more variable representation of multiple operations within each of the FPCN, VN and SMN networks. These neural patterns accounted for over 30 % of the variance in self-reported thought difficulties. Moreover, these associations were specific to working memory operations as they were not observed at rest, highlighting their relevance for understanding the neural mechanisms of repetitive negative thinking and their potential as biomarkers for interventions targeting impaired thought control
Neural patterns linked to thought control warrant no practice change; hypothesis-generating for cognitive network research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeRosa et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy individuals (non-clinical sample) (n=48). Working memory control operations (maintain, replace, suppress, clear) vs. Resting state was evaluated on Variance in self-reported thought control difficulties explained by neural patterns. Specific multi-voxel neural patterns during working memory operations accounted for over 30% of the variance in self-reported thought control difficulties.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: