Key result
The six-item German VS-MTQ demonstrates satisfactory reliability and validity in amateur and elite athletes.
Why the study?
Given ongoing debate about the factor structure of the English Mental Toughness Questionnaire, this study aimed to assess the psychometric properties and factorial structure of German versions.
Cross-Sectional (n=582)
The German version of the Very Short Mental Toughness Questionnaire (VS-MTQ-G) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing mental toughness in athletes.
Facilitates mental toughness assessment in German-speaking athletes; leaves open predictive validity and intervention utility in prospective studies.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a German version of the Mental Toughness Questionnaire (MTQ48; Clough et al., 2002 ). Given the ongoing debate about the factor structure of the English version, a thorough analysis of the factorial structure of the various German versions was in order. In Study 1 ( N = 292), the factor structures of the German version of the MTQ48 and its short forms were examined. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the 1-factor model of the six-item German version of the Very Short Mental Toughness Questionnaire (VS-MTQ-G) had the best model fit, with acceptable internal consistency and factor loadings. In Study 2 ( N = 201), the expected correlations between the VS-MTQ-G and convergent (i. e., alternative measure of mental toughness, self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, and rumination) as well as discriminant (i. e., social desirability) measures indicated the validity of the questionnaire. Study 3 ( N = 89) demonstrated good test–retest reliability of the measure within a 7-day interval. All studies were conducted in different samples of athletes, consisting of amateur and elite athletes. Overall, the VS-MTQ-G shows satisfactory reliability and validity, thus serving as an economical diagnostic tool for the unidimensional assessment of mental toughness. Future studies should include a more diverse sample from various contexts to ensure the measure’s generalizability and applicability to individual diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dziuba et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Mental toughness (n=582). Very Short Mental Toughness Questionnaire (VS-MTQ-G) was evaluated on Psychometric properties (factor structure, validity, and reliability). The six-item German version of the Very Short Mental Toughness Questionnaire (VS-MTQ-G) demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity across three studies of 582 amateur and elite athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: