Key result
A smartphone-based system using inertial sensors achieved comparable results to goniometer measurements for upper-extremity joint angle assessments in stroke patients, while reducing assessment time.
Why the study?
Does a smartphone-based system using inertial sensors provide comparable range of motion assessments to goniometer measurements in stroke patients?
Does a smartphone-based system using inertial sensors provide comparable range of motion assessments to goniometer measurements in stroke patients?
A smartphone-based system using inertial sensors can automate upper-extremity motor assessments in stroke patients, achieving comparable accuracy to goniometers in less time.
May support faster automated ROM assessments in stroke rehab; leaves open need for larger trials before clinical adoption.
The range of motion (ROM) in stroke patients is often severely affected. Poststroke rehabilitation is guided through the use of clinical assessment scales for the rROM. Unfortunately, these scales are not widely utilized in clinical practice as they are excessively time-consuming. Although commercial motion-capture systems are capable of providing the information required for the assessments, most systems are either too costly or lack the convenience required for assessments to be conducted on a daily basis. This paper presents the design and implementation of a smartphone-based system for automated motor assessment using low-cost off-the-shelf inertial sensors. The system was used to automate a portion of the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), which is widely used to quantify motor deficits in stroke survivors. Twelve out of 33 items were selected, focusing mainly on joint angle measurements of the upper body. The system has the ability to automatically identify the assessment item being conducted, and calculate the maximum respective joint angle achieved. Preliminary results show the ability of this system to achieve comparable results to goniometer measurements, while significantly reducing the time required to conduct the assessments. The portability and ease-of-use of the system would simplify the task of conducting range-of-motion assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2014) studied Stroke. Smartphone-based system using inertial sensors vs. Goniometer measurements was evaluated on Joint angle measurements and assessment time. A smartphone-based system using inertial sensors achieved comparable results to goniometer measurements for upper-extremity joint angle assessments in stroke patients, while reducing assessment time.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: