Key result
Low-volume high-intensity interval training increased maximal oxygen uptake to a significantly greater extent than circuit training (mean difference 2.9 ml kg-1 min-1) in healthy middle-aged adults.
Why the study?
High-intensity interval training and circuit training improve cardiorespiratory fitness, but direct comparisons between these two methods are limited.
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training improve maximal oxygen uptake to a greater extent than circuit training in apparently healthy middle-aged adults?
RCT (n=42)
Randomized
No
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training improve maximal oxygen uptake to a greater extent than circuit training in apparently healthy middle-aged adults?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 2.9 ml kg-1 min-1 (95% CI 1.4-4.3)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.9% vs 1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Low-volume high-intensity interval training is a more time-efficient and efficacious approach for improving cardiorespiratory fitness compared to standard circuit training in healthy middle-aged adults.
Low-volume HIIT offers a superior option to circuit training for fitness gains in middle-aged adults; extends RCT comparisons of training efficacy.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and circuit training (CT) are popular methods of exercise, eliciting improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). However, direct comparisons of these two training methods are limited. We investigated the effects of HIIT and CT on CRF. Thirty-nine apparently healthy middle-aged participants [HIIT; mean age: 42.5 ± 12.3; V̇O₂ₘₐₓ 31.5 ± 7.1 (ml kg−1 min−1); 52% males; CT; mean age: 41.2 ± 12.9; V̇O₂ₘₐₓ 31.4 ± 6.8 (ml kg−1 min−1); 57% males] were randomly allocated to two sessions per week of HIIT or CT over 8 weeks. HIIT performed ten 1-min cycle-ergometry intervals at > 85% HRmax, separated by ten 1-min intervals of active recovery. The CT group performed up to 40-min of CT at 60–80% HRmax. CRF was measured using maximum oxygen uptake ( V̇O₂ₘₐₓ ), ventilatory anaerobic threshold ( V̇O₂ at VAT) and maximum oxygen pulse ( V̇O₂ /HR). V̇O₂ₘₐₓ increased by 12% following HIIT (mean difference 3.9 ml kg−1 min−1; 95% CI: 2.8–4.9; P < 0.001), and 3% in CT (mean difference 1.0 ml kg−1 min−1; 95% CI: − 0.4 to 2.0; P = 0.060). V̇O₂ at VAT increased by 16% following HIIT (mean difference 2.4 ml kg−1 min−1; 95% CI: 1.6–3.1; P < 0.001) and 4% in CT (mean difference 0.7 ml kg−1 min−1; 95% CI: − 0.1 to 1.4; P = 0.085). V̇O₂ /HR increased by 11% following HIIT (mean difference 1.4 ml beat−1; 95% CI: 0.9–2.0; P < 0.001) and 1% after CT (mean difference 0.3 ml beat−1; 95% CI: − 0.3 to 0.8; P = 0.318). Our study demonstrated that HIIT led to greater improvements in CRF when compared to CT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03700671.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birkett et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy middle-aged adults (n=42). Low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. Circuit training (CT) up to 40-min at 60-80% HRmax was evaluated on Change in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) (Mean difference 2.9 ml kg-1 min-1, 95% CI 1.4-4.3, p=<0.001). Low-volume high-intensity interval training increased maximal oxygen uptake to a significantly greater extent than circuit training (mean difference 2.9 ml kg-1 min-1) in healthy middle-aged adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: