Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although the presence of serum p53 antibody (s-p53-Abs) before treatment has been shown to correlate with poor prognosis and lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer, there has been little information about postoperative s-p53-Abs titer and perioperative changes of s-p53-Abs titers in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: A highly specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to analyze s-p53-Abs in 110 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before and 1 month after surgery. The cutoff level of 1.3 U/ml was used to indicate seropositive patients. Impact of postoperative s-p53-Abs titer and perioperative changes of s-p53-Abs on survival was evaluated. RESULTS: Forty (36%) of 110 patients were positive for s-p53-Abs before surgery and 35 patients (32%) were positive after surgery. s-p53-Abs titer generally decreased after surgery. Among sero-positive patients, the patients who remained sero-positive after surgery (n = 28) had a worse prognosis than patients who showed sero-conversion (P = 0.02). Among sero-positive patients, the nondecreased titer group showed significantly unfavorable survival (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative s-p53-Abs was an independent risk factor for worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.05; 95% confidence interval = 1.11-8.33; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative monitoring of s-p53-Abs titers was useful to identify patients with esophageal cancer with a high risk for tumor recurrence and a poor prognosis. Continuous sero-positive patients and/or nondecreased titer group, even after surgery, showed significantly unfavorable survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimada et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: