Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Jerusalem the term pluralism recently received an alternative meaning -non-Haredi. Conflicts between the "pluralist" and the Ultra-Orthodox populations regarding the character of city neighborhoods are quite frequent. The focus of this article is one Jerusalem neighborhood -Baka -and the conflicts that occurred there around this issue in 2009-10. Neighborhood residents interpreted and framed the conflicts as opposition to Ultra-Orthodox penetration, but I argue, relying on ethnographic data analysis of two conflicts, that the main focus was the definition of the public space. As these conflicts involved Ultra-Orthodox and organizations, in the sensitive context of Jerusalem, framing them as anti-Ultra-Orthodox penetration was useful in mobilizing residents" participation and in gaining wider legitimation and support. More broadly, based on my ethnography, I argue that residents participate in neighborhood affairs due to sentiments of belonging and commitment, thus creating the political format I term "neighborhood citizenship".
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hila Zaban (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: