Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: malaria is considered a public health threat for the humankind worldwide, estimations indicate that more than 1/3 of the population is in equal risk of acquiring it. Shared borders between countries with different malaria prevalence and preventive strategies delays elimination goals. Aim: to analyze malaria transmission dynamics in the cross border areas of Mozambique, South Africa and ESwatini from March 2017 to March 2019. Methodology: a secondary malaria database was used. Ratio comparison tests and logistic regression model estimation were done. The sample consisted of 250563 migrants and residents in MOSASWA cross-border areas tested for malaria, between March 2017 to March 2019. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Results: 250563 people were tested, out of which, 93035 (37.13%) were migrant populations and 157528 (62.87%) were residents of the surrounding areas. Regarding gender and occupation, 50.1% were male and 76% had informal occupation. The positivity rate was 2.1% (5253), out of which, 33.3% (1751) were mobile and migrant populations, 45.9% of the total cases were asymptomatic carriers. 39.18% (686) and 28.44% (498) of the positive migrants were using the Macuacua and Ressano Garcia borders on their way to South Africa respectively. 66.7% of the positives cases were surrounding populations, out of which 20.5% and 20.6% crossed the borders three to four times a week. The predictive power of having malaria increased 5.090 and 3.540 times more if the migrant had been tested in Mozambique and if he/she was a resident in the neighbouring borders, crossing into the borders of the same country respectively. Conclusions: A large number of the moving cases were diagnosed in Mozambique on their way to South Africa through Macuacua border.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uate et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: