A wide‐ranging research project covering change and its implementation in 27 companies provides the opportunity for the authors of this article to reassess the meaning and significance of HRM. They suggest that ‘it is too simple to dismiss HRM as “old wine in new bottles”.’ Rather, they find important changes taking place. But the true significance of HRM, they suggest, lies not in the fact that its practice actually does resolve underlying tensions but rather in its capacity to ‘manage’ these by ‘reducing, suppressing and glossing’ them. HRM itself is an outcome of the tensions in the employment relationship and, perhaps not surprisingly therefore, it continues to express them. the article ends with suggestions for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezzamel et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: