Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A carbon cycle model is described incorporating CO2 fertilization feedback and a convolution ocean model that allows the atmosphere-to-ocean flux to be varied. The main parameters controlling the model’s behaviour are a fertilization feedback parameter (r) and an ocean flux scaling factor (characterized by the mean carbon flux into the ocean over the 1980s, F(1980s)). Since the model’s 1980s-mean net land-use-change flux (Dn(1980s)) is a unique function of r and F(1980s), the model’s behaviour can also be characterized by specifying Dn(1980s) (instead of r) and F(1980s). The history of past land-use fluxes, Dn (t), is derived by inverse modelling for a range of values of F(1980s) (1.0–3.0 GtC/yr) and Dn(1980s) (0.6–2.6 GtC/yr). Even with this flexibility, the resultant Dn(t) differs markedly from the observationally-based record of Houghton, particularly before 1950. The inverse calculations are used to determine the history of the so-called “missing sink” as directly by the model and by the observationally-based record of Dn(t), for a range of ocean uptake efficiencies as defined by F(1980s). Projections of future CO2 concentration changes are made for the 6 emissions scenarios recently produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IS92a—f). The ability to specify F(1980s) and Dn(1980s) allows one to account for the missing sink in a variety of ways, and to account for uncertainties in the amount of missing carbon. This leads to a range of projections and provides some insights into the uncertainties surrounding these projections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. M. L. Wigley (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: