Why the study?
ECG data in the UK Biobank provides an opportunity to screen for AF, prompting the evaluation of machine-learning methods for automated AF detection in this large dataset.
Does a combined machine-learning and deep learning approach accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ECG data from the UK Biobank compared to human experts?
Cross-Sectional (n=75,778)
Yes
Does a combined machine-learning and deep learning approach accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ECG data from the UK Biobank compared to human experts?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated detection of atrial fibrillation using combined machine learning and deep learning on large-scale ECG databases is feasible and achieves performance comparable to human experts.
OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with an estimated prevalence of around 1.6% in the adult population. The analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) data acquired in the UK Biobank represents an opportunity to screen for AF in a large sub-population in the UK. The main objective of this paper is to assess ten machine-learning methods for automated detection of subjects with AF in the UK Biobank dataset. APPROACH: Six classical machine-learning methods based on support vector machines are proposed and compared with state-of-the-art techniques (including a deep-learning algorithm), and finally a combination of a classical machine-learning and deep learning approaches. Evaluation is carried out on a subset of the UK Biobank dataset, manually annotated by human experts. MAIN RESULTS: The combined classical machine-learning and deep learning method achieved an F1 score of 84.8% on the test subset, and a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.83, which is similar to the inter-observer agreement of two human experts. SIGNIFICANCE: The level of performance indicates that the automated detection of AF in patients whose data have been stored in a large database, such as the UK Biobank, is possible. Such automated identification of AF patients would enable further investigations aimed at identifying the different phenotypes associated with AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oster et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=75,778). Combined classical machine-learning and deep learning method vs. Human expert annotation and other machine learning methods was evaluated on F1 score for automated detection of Atrial Fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: