Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sea-ice motion and dynamic thickness build-up play an important role in the transfer of heat between the ocean and the atmosphere and so must be included in large-scale climate studies. A “cavitating-fluid” approximation allows these dynamic processes to be parameterized in a simple way by ignoring shear and tensile strength yet retaining compressive strength. A simple procedure for approximating a cavitating fluid is presented here and is compared to the more complete viscous-plastic sea-ice model by performing several three year simulations with daily varying and monthly average wind forcing. Although differences exist on a monthly basis, the two models compare favourably over a seasonal cycle, particularly when compared to a thermodynamics only model in which ice motion is ignored. The lack of shear strength in a cavitating-fluid approximation makes it less sensitive to smoothing of the wind fields (as demonstrated by the monthly average wind simulations); however it also changes the detailed circulation and thickness build-up patterns somewhat. Overall, the cavitating-fluid approximation shows considerable promise for including sea-ice dynamics in large-scale climate models, especially where averaged wind fields are employed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flato et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: