We examine the sensitivity of simultaneous simulation of climate, natural 14 C, bomb 14 C, and anthropogenic CO 2 uptake to the choice of three different ocean mixing schemes: horizontal/vertical mixing (HV), isopycnal mixing (ISO), and Gent‐McWilliams mixing (GM) using an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, Integrated Science Assessment Model‐2.5D (ISAM‐2.5D). Our modeling results suggest that the HV scheme greatly underestimates the observed values of natural 14 C in the deep ocean, while the ISO and GM schemes yield more realistic results by simulating increased amounts of natural 14 C values through enhanced vertical diffusion and deep water formation. The GM scheme further improves the ISO‐based natural 14 C distribution in the Southern Ocean and the deep Pacific and Indian oceans through a more realistic simulation of the Southern Ocean circulation. The model simulated global uptake of anthropogenic CO 2 for the 1980s ranges between 1.8 and 2.3 PgC/yr, largely consistent with data‐based estimates and OGCM results. The ISAM‐2.5D simulated oceanic uptake of 14 C and CO 2 is highest for the ISO scheme and lowest for the HV scheme, with the largest discrepancies occurring among different mixing schemes found in the Southern Ocean. However, no single mixing scheme is more successful than the others in simulating GEOSECS‐measured uptake of bomb 14 C and anthropogenic CO 2 for various ocean basins. Climate change is found to reduce CO 2 uptake by 7–9% and 6–8% for the 1980s and over the period 1765–1990, mainly as a result of decreased CO 2 solubility associated with increased sea surface temperatures. However, the effect of climate change on bomb 14 C uptake is negligible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: